Sex and the Single Girl

Natalie_Woods_Sex_and_the_single_girl_3

This post is part of the Journalism in Classic Film Blogathon, hosted by Comet Over Hollywood and Lindsay’s Movie Musings. There are loads of great posts; check out all the entries here.

Based on Helen Gurley Brown’s bestselling book of the same name, Sex and the Single Girl tells a tongue-in-cheek tale about Gurley Brown (played by Natalie Wood) and Bob Weston (Tony Curtis), a borderline sleazy tabloid journalist who is out to reveal Brown’s lack of personal experience in sexual matters. It’s hardly a spoiler to reveal that they fall in love, the ending is written before the first 20 minutes are up; that’s not necessarily to the film’s detriment as the forgone conclusion allowed director Richard Quine to include some well-timed gags, especially during some of the later scenes.

Natalie_Woods_Sex_and_the_single_girl

In fact, the title is a little misleading. In the 1960s (the film was released in 1964) that short three-letter word came with a lot more scandal attached than it would today. Watching the film from a contemporary viewpoint, it’s more than tame, a light and glossy rom-com with an inevitable conclusion. The title might have been written to draw audiences in, but Gurley Brown’s advice manual (published in 1962) would have already set the scene. Her book encouraged women to become financially independent and to experience sexual relationships before marriage.

Natalie_Woods_Sex_and_the_single_girl

Natalie_Woods_Sex_and_the_single_girl

Brown’s book was a revelation to many young American women and her ideas reached an even larger audience when she was appointed editor of Cosmopolitan (a position she held from 1965 until 1997). In fact, Brown is widely credited with being the first to introduce frank discussions of sex into women’s magazines, but her feminist credentials have been (and still are) questioned. In her own words, she was ‘a feminist…I am for total equality’ but many derided her particular brand of ‘stiletto feminism’, or do-me feminism as it was also called.  It wasn’t until Brown died in August 2012 that popular feminist opinion swung back in her favour, although that might have more to do with an unwillingness to speak well of the deceased than reassessed judgements.

Brown might have inspired Wood’s character, but the inspiration didn’t stretch much further than the superficial. Wood-as-Brown is somewhat bland, nothing like the spirited author – but that’s where the problems with this film begin. The film isn’t really interested in saying something about single women and society but keen to capitalise on prior success. Whilst the film would never have been made without the book, it’s undoubtedly the book (and Brown’s) legacy that has allowed the film to retain its popularity; it surely would not have survived on merit alone. Disappointing, considering that the cast also includes Lauren Bacall, Henry Fonda and Mel Ferrer.

Natalie_Woods_Sex_and_the_single_girl_9

The 1960s was the most turbulent decades of the 20th century and, as film censorship was slowly abolished in the US, celluloid caught up. New subject matters, attitudes towards sex and violence and permissivenes were explored on screen. In 1961, Natalie Wood starred in Elia Kazan’s Splendor in the Grass, a film that featured Hollywood’s first on-screen, open-mouthed kiss and considerable nudity. Considering this history, Wood was perfectly placed to recreate Brown’s ideas, but Sex and the Single Girl never reached its full potential. According to Wood’s biography, the actress wasn’t completely satisfied with the finished film and was keen to take on more challenging roles, Sex and the Single Girl had the potential to be that film – but easy laughs and true love were to be the order of the day.

Natalie_Woods_Sex_and_the_single_girl

Natalie_Woods_Sex_and_the_single_girl

Costume notes: Edith Head designed Wood’s costumes. The pair had a close working relationship and Head even designed the actresses wedding dress. In most scenes, Wood is dressed in black and white, the graphic simplicity complements Edward G. Boyle’s sets but also represents Wood’s black-and-white view on life. Her white ‘doctor’s’ jacket comes with cropped sleeves and a slit back, and is worn with a black pencil dress and heeled court shoes. Later, Wood dons a white satin cocktail dress, complete with a sweetheart neckline and pendant, opera gloves and a luxurious fur-trimmed white coat.

The notable exception to the black and white theme comes in the final scene, when Wood dons a charming canary yellow dress, accessorised with pearls and perfectly colour-matched courts. She has finally found – and accepted – love, and this dress is the perfect expression of her joy.

Images via Dr Macro and Classiq

Natalie_Woods_Sex_and_the_single_girl Natalie_Woods_Sex_and_the_single_girl

15 thoughts on “Sex and the Single Girl

  1. Can’t say much about the film (because if you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say it), but Natalie Wood is always a treat. Have you ever caught her in Penelope? That one has a goofy ending, but the first two acts are a lot of fun. Thanks for the nice post and lovely screenshots!

    1. I enjoyed your playful yet thoughtful take on SEX AND THE SINGLE GIRL, having remembered much of it from when I watched it on TV as a kid! Natalie Wood and Tony Curtis worked well as a screen team, and you can’t beat that cast, including Team Bartilucci fave Lauren Bacall! When I was a youngster, my mom subscribed to COSMOPOLITAN, back when Helen Gurley Brown was alive and referring to herself and her fans as “mouseburgers” (considered an endearment back in the day, if I remember right :-)). Love your screen-grabs, too! Glad you joined the Journalism in Classic Film fun and frolic!

      1. I’m such a fan of Gurley Brown – she’s always been such an inspiration. I recently picked up a few of her copies of Cosmo at a bootsale in the UK, so I’m looking forward to analysing her editorial style in detail. Thanks for stopping by!

    1. I wanted so much more from this. I’ve been a longtime fan of Gurley Brown, and I really thought this would do her justice, still quite annoyed that it didn’t! I guess that’s what you get when you’ve idolised something for so long! Thanks for taking the time to read and comment

  2. I haven’t seen this, but am now wondering if was one of the movies which inspired ‘Down with Love’, as the plot of that seems rather similar! Your review has me intrigued even though you make it clear that the film has its flaws – will look out for it.

  3. Sadly, I agree with everything you’ve written. The film is a glossy, empty affair and the source material and Natalie Wood are wasted. However, she is always a joy to watch and she does look smashing!

  4. I want to see this film basically for the incredible cast. You made good points about the 1960s and all the cahnges that happened in women’s views and in Hollywood itself. I learned a lot with your post.
    Thanks for the kind comment!
    Kisses!

  5. I haven’t seen the film but I read the book a while back. Quite a few things HGB suggested to get further at work struck me as the typical things which would be frowned upon nowadays. I don’t know if it came through in the movie?

    1. LG – I’ve only read bits of the book. This had so much potential to be good – even with a comedic angle! – but there’s no real exploration of HGB’s ideas beyond the superficial. Although on the plus side it has promoted me to dig out the copy and re-read as I wanted to remind myself how seminal the original text was!

Leave a comment